Overall comfort levels are similar between the two. The 33×12.50r20 taller sidewall and greater air volume absorb bumps and impact more smoothly for a comfortable off-road ride.īut the 275/65r20 shorter sidewall and tread react quicker on paved roads for responsive handling. The wider 33×12.50r20 is heavier, creating more drag, so it will reduce gas mileage but offer more excellent traction and stability. This makes the 275/65r20 preferable for daily driving focused on efficiency. The narrower 275/65r20 tire typically provides better fuel economy with less rolling resistance and rotational mass than the wider 33×12.50r20. The smaller 275/65r20 reduces ground clearance, raising the risk of damage from road hazards, but gives a higher speedometer reading. However, the bigger diameter causes a lower speedometer reading. This added clearance is useful for off-roading by protecting components from scrapes or impacts with obstacles. The larger 33×12.50r20 tire provides 1.05 inches (26.8mm) more ground clearance than the 275/65r20. The 33×12.50r20 is near the limit for direct replacement, so lifting the suspension slightly would enable fitment without rubbing or scraping. This may require adaptations like a lift kit to prevent rubbing at complete turn. ![]() When replacing tires, staying within 3% of the original size’s overall diameter is recommended. This table is designed to help you quickly compare and understand the differences. ![]() This 15.6% wider tread makes the 33×12.50r20 more stable with better traction, but the narrower 275/65r20 is more agile and fuel-efficient. The 33×12.50r20 tire size is about 1.69 inches wider than the 275/65r20 tire size. The main difference between 275/65r20 and 33×12.50r20 tires is the section width.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |